Utah Vote Clears Path for Trolley Square South Housing
Table of Contents
A Site That's Sat Idle Since 2016
Trolley Square South has been a parking lot standing in for a development for close to ten years. As Building Salt Lake reports, plans first surfaced in 2016 to bring housing to the roughly 3.75-acre block south of Trolley Square, and those plans stalled more than once before Trolley Square Ventures picked the project back up in recent years.
That kind of timeline is not unusual in Salt Lake City's historic districts, where entitlement work, preservation review, and market cycles can each add years to a project's runway. What makes this case notable is that the site sat undeveloped through an entire cycle of rising land values and rent growth along the 400/600 South corridor, which means whatever gets built now will be underwritten against a very different rent basis than what pencils looked like in 2016.
The Home That Had to Move First
The immediate trigger for last week's news was narrow but consequential: a 7-1 vote by the Historic Landmark Commission to relocate a home built in 1896 at 630 S. 700 East to 636 E. Sego Ave, a few hundred yards away. The applicants proposed disassembling the structure piece by piece and reassembling it at the new address, built to modern code inside once relocated.
Commissioners Steven Cornell and Emoli Kearns pushed back on that method, preferring the home be moved intact. Cornell was blunt about his doubts, saying he was “pretty skeptical that this is actually going to be relocated in its entirety.” The staff report notes the applicant's position that the home's structural condition makes a full-piece move impractical, and Cornell ultimately cast the lone dissenting vote.
That disagreement matters less for the outcome — the motion passed — than for what it signals about how Salt Lake City's preservation bodies are willing to bend historic-fabric standards to get infill housing built. A disassemble-and-rebuild approach is a compromise, not a clean win for preservationists, and it's the kind of trade-off likely to recur as more historic-district parcels get pressed into service for housing.
A Mixed Bag of Apartments, Condos, and Townhomes
The plans submitted to the commission sketch out several buildings rather than one monolithic project: a two-story, 12-unit building with ground-floor retail at the block's northwest corner, a five-floor slab-on-grade condominium building, and a larger five-story multifamily building on a two-story podium that mixes apartments, condos, and two-story townhome units. The site is largely zoned MU-5 with an MU-3 parcel included, sitting inside the Central City Historic District.
That density and unit mix — for-rent and for-sale product on the same block — is a deliberate hedge. It lets the developer capture apartment demand near Trolley Square's retail and transit while also testing for-sale absorption in a submarket that hasn't seen much new condo product. For owners and investors tracking comparable sites near 600 South, this is the kind of blended program worth watching before locking in assumptions on rent or sale pricing for nearby parcels. Anyone evaluating land or existing product in that corridor should have a current read on entitlement risk in historic districts — it's the sort of due diligence our team at Team Utah Commercial (801-898-8810) walks clients through before they commit capital.
Site Plans Could Land Within Weeks
Attorney Douglas White told the commission that if the relocation proposal cleared, Trolley Square Ventures intended to submit its full site plan application for the multifamily complex within a couple of weeks. That's an aggressive turnaround after nearly a decade of delay, and it suggests the developer has already lined up the design and financing pieces behind the scenes, waiting only on this preservation approval.
No date has been set for that submission, and Salt Lake City's site plan review process still has to run its course once the application lands. Watch for whether the relocated home actually survives its move intact or in pieces — the answer will say something about how much latitude the city is willing to give future applicants proposing similar preservation workarounds on other stalled historic-district sites.
Source: this analysis discusses reporting by buildingsaltlake.
Back to Blog